Every service we offer is described below in plain language — what it is, what it delivers, and why it matters legally. We do not use jargon to obscure what you are buying.
There are two ways to approach website accessibility. One of them works. The other creates the appearance of compliance while leaving actual violations in place.
A complete WCAG 2.2 evaluation of your entire website — every page, image, link, form, table, video, PDF, and interactive element. We test against all applicable success criteria across Levels A and AA, which represent the legal standard in virtually every jurisdiction.
Without an audit, there is no reliable way to scope remediation. Anyone who offers to "fix your accessibility issues" without first documenting exactly what is broken is guessing — and guessing does not produce a defensible compliance record. The audit is the foundation of everything else.
We go into your site's actual source files — HTML templates, CSS, JavaScript, and theme files — and correct every violation identified in the audit. This is not a script applied on top of your site. These are structural changes to the code itself.
Remediation addresses violations found in the audit. It does not automatically cover new pages added after the project, new features added post-remediation, or PDFs and video (those are separate services). This is why Monthly Monitoring exists.
Every PDF document hosted on your site must be tagged with a logical reading order, proper heading structure, alternative text for images, and navigable bookmarks so that screen readers can process them correctly. An untagged PDF is functionally inaccessible to a blind user regardless of what the rest of your site does.
WCAG Success Criterion 1.2 explicitly requires captions for all pre-recorded audio and video content. A video without synchronized captions is a WCAG failure at Level A — the most basic required conformance level. We provide accurate, synchronized captions for your video content.
A Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) — formally called an Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) — is a standardized document that describes how your site conforms to WCAG and Section 508 criteria, criterion by criterion. It is the standard format expected by government purchasing officers, university procurement teams, and enterprise vendor qualification processes.
An Accessibility Statement is a published page on your site that declares your organization's commitment to accessibility, identifies the standard you are conforming to, describes any known limitations, and provides a contact method for users who encounter barriers. It is the public-facing record of your compliance posture.
Several U.S. state accessibility laws explicitly require a published accessibility statement. Courts and regulators view its presence as evidence of good faith. Its absence, conversely, can be used to demonstrate that no effort was made. After remediation, publishing an accurate statement is straightforward. The Accessibility Statement is included with every audit — we draft that is accurate, complete, and legally appropriate.
A dated, signed certificate documenting that your site was audited and remediated to WCAG 2.2 AA standard by Compliapoint. The certificate identifies the scope of work, the standard applied, the date of completion, and the issuing party.
A comprehensive written record of the entire engagement: every issue identified in the audit, every fix applied during remediation, the methodology used, tools employed, and the resulting compliance status of your site at project completion.
If your accessibility is ever challenged in litigation, a regulator review, or an enterprise audit, the Deliverable Report is your documented evidence that remediation was performed properly and completely. It is not a summary — it is a full technical record. Organizations that cannot produce this documentation in a legal context are at a significant disadvantage.
A recurring monthly scan of your site against WCAG 2.2 AA standards, delivered as a written report identifying any new violations that have appeared since the last scan. Accessibility degrades naturally over time as content is updated, pages are added, plugins are changed, and themes are modified.
Organizations that publish new content frequently, operate e-commerce platforms with changing product pages, or operate in regulated industries where ongoing compliance documentation is required will benefit most from monthly monitoring. It is not necessary for static sites that rarely change.
Rush Processing moves your engagement to the front of the queue and commits to delivery within 1–3 business days. Standard turnaround is 7–10 business days.
Rush Processing applies to the entire engagement scope. It is a flat $799 add-on regardless of the total project size.
After your team applies remediation fixes — whether your own developers or an outside contractor — we re-test every corrected issue to confirm resolution and document the final compliance status of your site.
A Compliance Certificate can only be issued once all issues identified in the original audit have been verified as resolved. Validation Testing is the step that bridges the gap between "we fixed it" and documented, defensible proof that the fixes held. Without it, your certificate has no evidentiary foundation.
Direct access to our accessibility specialists for developer Q&A, fix validation, remediation guidance, and compliance strategy. Billed in one-hour increments at $195/hour with a one-hour minimum.
Consulting hours do not replace a full audit or remediation engagement — they support teams who are doing the work themselves and need specialist guidance along the way.
Complete the 3-minute Site Accessibility Assessment. We review your answers and your site, then send a written proposal identifying exactly what applies to your situation — no obligation until you approve it.